|

Chastity Belts
And why western women should wear them
In Sweden, it is widely regarded as understandable for a woman
to feel assaulted or taken advantage of if she hasn’t given active
consent every step of the way during a sexual interaction.
Yep. My missus had a Swedish air about her when I first met her.
On top of her blond hair, a viking helmet, and below her blond
hair, a chastity belt.
And you had to ask her permission for your every move!
"Can I hold your hand?" I asked her when we had dated each other
for about a year.
"Hmm. I don't know about that, Harry," she said after a few hours
thought. "It seems to me that you are getting a bit too fruity
these days. Maybe you should take a cold shower to quench your
wicked thoughts. Let me think about it for a year or two."
But she caved in pretty quickly when a few months later I gave her
an ultimatum.
"Either we get to hold hands, or I leave you for another woman," I
said.
"Then leave," she said.
Victory!
Ah yes. Those were the days; when men were men and when women
were, as ever, nothing but trouble.
LOL!
And, talking about chastity belts; it seems to me that feminists
who are genuinely concerned about rape should tell women to wear
them and to keep the keys somewhere safe.
Yes. I'm quite serious.
After all, this is all that women would really need to do to
protect themselves from any overzealous lovers or rape attacks
from strangers.
And if rape is so awful (the near-equivalent of murder so they
tell us) and so prevalent, then, surely, if feminists are really
concerned about it then they should advise women to do all that
they can do to prevent it.
chastity belts would be hugely effective
And chastity belts would be hugely effective in preventing
'rapes'.
Furthermore, the cost and the aggravation of using them would be
minimal in comparison to the alleged benefits.
Rape free!
Of course, feminists would be foaming throughout all their sticky
orifices in an attempt to manufacture public outrage at the idea
that they should wear chastity belts.
"This is outrageous," they would say. "Women should not need to
wear chastity belts to be safe from rape. Women should be able to
wear what they like."
But, clearly, according to themselves, women are just not safe
from rape.
Rape is just about everywhere.
And so if they are genuinely
concerned to prevent women from experiencing it, then they should
advise women to wear chastity belts.
As matters stand, however, they have corrupted the entire justice
system and biased it wholesale against all men.
They have spent over two decades pouring hatred on to
all men via their various
hysterical and deeply unpleasant campaigns.
They have poisoned the relationships between men and women right
throughout the nation - if not across the planet.
And they are forever squealing and squawking about not enough
being done in order to protect women from rape.
Henceforth, therefore, whenever I receive an email from some
feminist
'offended' by this website who claims that women are being raped
all over the place, I am going to tell her that she could save
women from this terrible experience simply by encouraging them to wear
chastity
belts.
Yep. I am being absolutely serious.
women, themselves, could mostly solve the problem
Why the hell should we all have to put up with all the huge
ongoing costs, the perpetual stirring up of hatred towards men,
the enormous bureaucracy, the corruption, the appalling treatment
of innocent men, etc etc, in a continued
failing attempt to prevent rape when women,
themselves, could mostly solve the problem with hardly any effort
on their part, and not much in the way of inconvenience?
And if women wearing chastity belts prevents just one woman from
being raped then it's worth it, isn't it? - e.g. see, Lying
Is Acceptable Say Police - because this is how they justify lying
about the domestic violence statistics.)
|